Absolutely FANTASTIC article! A must read!
Originally posted at National Vanguard Here
JUST WHEN YOU THINK that Jew whining has reached its maximum possible level, you realize you are wrong: Jew whining has no maximum level.
They don’t kvetch and kibbitz so much as whine and whinge.
And Jew whining will never end.
Not that long ago the putrid state of California, which is well on its way to well-deserved dissolution, passed an “ethnic studies” requirement for high school students. This meant that in order to graduate, students had to put down their mobile device for two seconds and learn about some minority and how bad they have supposedly had it. Though of course it was not couched in these terms, this meant in essence that every public school student had to learn about the “evils” of the White race and the need to eliminate White people from the face of the Earth.
This was exactly what was wanted by the Jews, who have been preaching and promulgating the “White man evil” doctrine since time out of mind. And the idea that it was now to be shoved forcefully down the throats of children by public school “teachers” was, to Jews, almost too good to be true.
Clearly they were winning.
But a funny thing happened on the way to White genocide. The Jews say they are smart, but sometimes you wonder. For, in being the prime advocates for this down-with-whitey change to the curriculum, they grossly miscalculated. They forgot that the kind of people who inhabit the fever swamps of (mis-) education in far left California aren’t all that crazy about Jews either. And soon the Jews came in for some abuse in the proposed curriculum — mentions being made about Israel being “fascist” and the righteousness of the BDS movement, that sort of thing.
Which was not what they expected at all. They were minorities, too, after all! Victims!
But there it was: The Jew was on the other foot.
Jews were seen as being White — and for Jews that would not do.
So what was a Jew to do?
Complain about it, of course, which they did in all the Jew rags. If anything defines a Jew is that they want to have their cake and eat it too — but the lesson is: Don’t call for genocide and then bitch about the gas. Though if a Jew has ever learned a lesson, I certainly have never heard about it.
* * *
So which is it? Are the Jews the man? Or the little man? Are they the marginalized oppressed? Or the rich and powerful oppressors?
Are they the mouse in the striped shirt being pursued by cat? Or the cat itself?
For the seasoned “anti-Semite,” this is a question that answers itself, but for the average bloke it can be confusing.
And now a Jew comedian from England named David Baddiel has weighed in and comes down foursquare on one side: Jews are victims; they have always been victims; and they will always be victims. And they don’t get nearly enough credit for it.
So he is bloody well ticked off that Jews aren’t getting their share, which is to say the lion’s share, of the victimhood gravy train.
In England they call their Africans, their Pakis, and their Indians “visible minorities.”
Baddiel thinks Jews are the “invisible minority.”
David Baddiel shows how the view of Jews as privileged or White leads many progressives to ignore antisemitism, even collude with it.
Ane he’s bitching, whining, and moaning to rectify this.
Despite the history of persecution, there is only one minority that, for privilege-checkers, stays firmly in the square of privilege.
In other words, a Jew is crying out. Which is indistinguishable from them striking you.
* * *
When the Jews claim victim status, it makes you realize why chutzpah is a Yiddish word. Jews control the media, the arts, finance, government, and education in all Western countries. They practice nepotism that makes the mafia look open and liberal. And yet, just because a small but growing group of people see through their charades and call them out, they believe (or perhaps only claim to believe, and want us to believe) they are the number one victim group. When their treachery is exposed, they want to hide behind the “moral paragon” status perversely given to all of the outcasts of the world by the twisted moral system that now prevails. To cut them out of any part of the victim action is too much for them to stand; so they horn in. A Jew is always the biggest big-footer around.
His central claim is that antisemitism is seen as unimportant in UK society, especially amongst those he calls progressives. He says that Jews are erased from public discourse and racism against them is not taken seriously because they are seen as part of the white majority, do not stand out from the crowd visually, and on the average are not economically or socially disadvantaged.
So unfunny comedian David Baddiel has set out to address this non-issue with a book called Jews Don’t Count. Clearly he’s not talking about shekels, because no one denies they count those to the last one.
It is the comedian and writer David Baddiel’s contention that one type of racism has been left out of this fight. He outlines why and how, in a time of intensely heightened awareness of minorities, Jews don’t count as a real minority: and why they should.
That is: Here comes the whining, here comes the whingeing.
First of all, remember that this is a time of obsession with minorities thanks alone to Jews; without them, none of the “visibles” would have had the horses to bring themselves to the center of the world’s attention; it was Jews who opened the borders to double, triple, quintuple their numbers; it was Jews who taught the world to worship them; it was Jews who used Negroes in America as a test case, and soon branched out to every minor branch of what they call humanity.
So now the Jews don’t want to get left out of all the perks of being “oppressed by Whites”; they’re afraid that more and more people see them, the Jews, as the privileged — and they can’t abide that.
The premise of Jews Don’t Count is that antisemitism is too often glossed over – blanked out – by just those progressives who would usually rush to support any beleaguered minority group.
It occurs to me that in the mainstream right and the mainstream left there is no paucity of attention paid to the Jews’ every little hangnail, to the Jews in general, and “anti-Semitism” above all else. Governors and legislators and bureaucrats and Presidents drool all over themselves placating Jews, mollifying them, appeasing them, and putting whatever Jews want in the grade school curriculum. American politicians go to the wall (the Jew wall — not the other one, sadly), and all and sundry make it their life mission to get on the good side of Jews. When it comes to the good graces and good offices of the Jews (such as they are), no one wants to be left holding the bag, unless it’s a bag of shekels. And the likes of Baddiel still wail. He has of course written off the big “anti-Semites” of the right, but what gets under his thin Jew skin is his natural cohort, the far left. Why, isn’t the left full of good-hearted people? Can’t they see that Jews are good-hearted too? (Excuse me while I get back up off the floor.) And all this tears this vile Jew up inside. A Jew wants all the accolades. Jews can’t stand that they are disliked in any way, while at the very same time they know that many, many people are intensely aware of how much they stink.
And they do, of course — to high heaven.
So the Jew cries out as a way to strike you.
The sub-title is more telling about the theme of the book: How Identity Politics Failed One Particular Identity. Baddiel wants to be part of identity politics in which he is not reviled as being, as he remarks, “white-male-cis-het.”
In the far reaches of the left, the Jews have met many people who have learned the Jews’ lessons all too well; in them they have created a Frankenstein (emphasis on the stein) monster and been hoisted on their own petard.
And it could not have happened to a more demonic group of people.
The book opens with a series of examples of antisemitism failing to register as a cause for concern; the cumulative impact of these is to make a forceful case for the existence of double standards.
“Double standards,” meaning Jews don’t get proper credit for being a minority. But Jews complaining about double standards is like the patricide-matricide complaining about being an orphan. When it comes to double standards, Jews are past masters giving a perpetual master class — one standard for them, another for everyone else — always.
A telling instance relates to the 2019 musical production of Alice Walker’s The Color Purple. While the actress, Seyi Omooba, was sacked from playing the role of Celie because of her homophobic views, antisemitic statements made by Alice Walker herself don’t seem to have registered as a deal-breaker.
Now Alice Walker is a mutant freak herself, so she’s no exemplar of sanity. But even as the blind squirrel catches a nut now and again, she honed in on the Jews as the singular face of evil.
In a 2018 interview with the New York Times, Walker promoted Icke’s book And the Truth Shall Set You Free which argues that Jews control the world and quotes extensively from the discredited Protocols of the Elders of Zion.
(It seems they now have an algorithm which, when you type in the words “Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion,” automatically inserts the word “discredited” before them.)
Walker also would not allow The Color Purple to be translated into Hebrew, after which both Steven Spielberg and Whoopi Goldberg were not available for comment.
Baddiel fears that antisemitism is increasingly being seen as a second-class racism.
Nothing but top-drawer, first-class racism will do for Jews when it comes to their suffering.
Baddiel goes on to engage with the familiar argument that Jews are excluded from the category of oppressed groups because they are themselves associated with the oppressors – with money and power.
Familiar indeed. It is like the day before yesterday, the morning sun, and the sky above us, perennial and true. It’s a pesky fact that Jews have inordinate power, and wield it exclusively for their own benefit — but they want you to think they just emerged reeking from the ghetto, fleeing the latest pogrom, wearing their black coats and black hats, all poor and greasy and barking out a snarling Yiddish. You’re tempted to say they’ve cleaned up nice, but we all know that’s not true. It’s simply no longer the ordeal of civility they undergo, but the ordeals they inflict on their hosts.
Leftists need, as Baddiel puts it, a Jewish rear-view mirror The same people who would usually insist on any minority group’s right to define what is racist are often the first to react indignantly if one of their own is charged with antisemitism.
Jews look at rear-view mirrors to see all the damage they’ve done — just like Kamala Harris reads Sir Walter Scott.
The Mear One mural saga is described in full, he highlights the racism of that artist’s response to the controversy – ‘some of the older white Jewish folk in the local community had a problem with me portraying their beloved Rothschild or Warburg’ – and offers a pithy analysis explaining just why this is so vile.
Mear One (believe it or not) is a person, not an entity — a “street artist,” in the same category as Basquiat. While Basquiat is a low-rent nonentity, Mear One did put up some truth on the streets of Merry Old England on one occasion, much to the consternation of the British Sanhedrin.
The mural, which was subsequently scrubbed off, pictured several apparently Jewish bankers playing a game of Monopoly, with their tabletop resting on the bowed naked backs of several workers.
It must really rile Jews when “street artists,” who are always communists, always left wing lunatics, always little better than vagabonds spraying graffiti on buildings — when even they start scoring on you and riffing on your greed.
He then juxtaposes the neo-Nazi insistence that Jews are Asiatic with a tendency on the left to assert that Jews are white, and goes on to demonstrate that being Jewish can even be invoked as a way of intensifying someone’s white status, further separating them from any right to identify as oppressed, and thus from any claim to sympathy.
Now we’re back to the Whoopi Goldberg conundrum; the last and least thing Jews want to be seen as is White; they’d rather die a million cruel deaths, and they certainty don’t want to possess the reflected glare of Whiteness when it comes to privilege and rank.
They are cruel, merciless bankers who want the world to think of them as the bums beneath the overpass who are there because of cruel, merciless bankers.
In a similar vein, Baddiel points out that Jews are effectively excluded from the BAME category; thus Sajid Javid was hailed as the first BAME Chancellor of the Exchequer when Nigel Lawson had previously held that role.
BAME (for those of you lucky enough not to know) is a British term for “Black, Asian, or Minority Ethnic” — the “visible minorities,” or rather a grab-bag of racial flotsam and jetsam; a catch-all term for the invaders who are being handed Great Britain on a Jewish platter. Apparently in Britain, being “BAME” is a status enhancer.
And it’s just like the Jew to want to take what little splendor this poor wog Javid has as the “first” race alien to hold such-and-such a position. And really, to say that a Jew in charge of the money, whose job has been likened to being a “taxing machine,” well, to say that that’s out of the ordinary is laughable. It would be like saying that Mnuchin at Treasury was a “trail-blazing minority” — when in fact it’s simply the sad way this world has been for a long, long time.
Because Jews aren’t viewed in the same way as other minorities, Baddiel goes on to point out, there is little anxiety about casting non-Jews in Jewish roles in films and TV shows – such as The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel and Friday Night Dinner – where Jewishness is absolutely central to the story.
We’ve heard this rant before; recently Jew Maureen Lipmann objected to non-Jew Helen Mirren being cast as the hideously ugly Jewess Golda Meir, a creature who had the face that sank a thousand ships.
First the Jew producers and directors cast good-looking Aryans to portray Jews — to plant the subconscious message in the viewers’ minds that “Jews are just like us, only handsomer and better.” And then some other media Jews start shrieking about how the movie industry must be “anti-Semitic” for not casting Jews in those roles. You can’t win with these worms. The acorn is not under any of the cups.
Of course no day goes by when Jews in Hollywood don’t cast Africans in White roles — roles from knightly Europe, or roles from the great White sagas — and Jews applaud and encourage that. And no White is allowed to complain about it on pain of being classified as a “racist” — Your career is over, bigot!
Double standards indeed. Who, exactly, is it who needs that rear-view mirror?
In a footnote he notes the media figures who hide their Jewish heritage, and observes that (nowadays) this is rarely done with any other minority ethnic background.
That’s because Jews are sneaky. That behavior is called crypsis. They certainly are not ashamed to be Jews, they just don’t want anyone thinking about it too hard.
Baddiel reflects on the status of the word Jew, contrasting anxieties about this word with the way some other minorities have reclaimed slang insults against them. For in the case of Jews, what should be an entirely neutral signifier is itself a potential insult, leading many to opt instead for the periphrasis Jewish people, due to the systemic racism of Judeo-Christian culture, the submerged power that hangs around, because of two centuries of linguistic toxicity.
It’s true — you call a Greek a Greek, or an Italian an Italian, and it’s no big deal. But to call a Jew a Jew is exactly like calling a spade a spade — fighting words, my friend. Is there any greater insult you can hurl, I wonder, than calling someone a Jew?
And then Baddiel plays the innocent lamb:
Why have the Jewish people been persecuted over and over again throughout history? Why? I never get an answer.
That is so absurd it is presented without comment.
The authors of this commentary tease out the paradox that a book, claiming that Jews don’t count, should appear after a sustained wave of allegations of antisemitism in the Labour Party in which Jews, or anti-Jewish racism, have counted – to the virtual exclusion of others (Blacks and Muslims, to cast the net no wider) suffering from prevalent forms of racism and discrimination.
Here it comes: the victimhood sweepstakes. The Jew cries out, the African cries out, the Paki cries out, the Indians cry out, and the White man pays out — and suffers the death of a thousand cuts.
He sees Jews as excluded from the Minority Ethnic collective of the Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic (BAME) designation because they are mistakenly seen as privileged and therefore white. He redefines whiteness as safe rather than privileged or having a particular skin tone, and so thinks that he and other Jews are non-white, because of their deep insecurity, which is a recurring theme in the book.
This is the bloodbath of the squabbling tribes we stupidly allowed into our countries; while we stupidly prohibited ourselves from any prerogatives — gave them the prerogatives –, and no sooner had we done it than they began to bash one another over the head to determine which tribe will feed on our blood through the most copious veins.
In Britain things have gotten so bad in this regard that they created a commission to determine the various valences of each minority; it seems it was a Jew-run thing as it absurdly made the Jews (who essentially rule the UK) out to be the recipients of the most “oppression.” It was called the EHRC (Equality and Human Rights Commission), but it might as well have billed itself as the death warrant for the White British.
The EHRC report opened itself up to the observation that it had established a hierarchy of racism with antisemitism at the apex. The current leadership of the Labour Party responded with an action plan, that included instruction to all Labour Party members on understanding antisemitism from the Jewish Labour Movement (JLM) before addressing any other discrimination.